simsa04 (simsa04@gnusocial.net)'s status on Saturday, 01-Oct-2022 05:49:38 JST
simsa04With today's annexation of the four Ukrainian oblasts and their declaration as Russian territory by the Kremlin, expect a major war in the whole of Europe between NATO and Russia in the near future. (And no, you cannot "prepare" for that. You can perhaps flee, if you have a destination abroad and travel means to reach it.)
With the annexation of four Ukrainian oblasts as new territories of the Russian Federation, Putin gained a major victory. Every further fighting will be seen by Russia (not just Putin) as an attack on the "motherland". People will accept the current partial and future general mobilisation. People, now grudgingly, in a few weeks far more enthusiastically, will embrace the war situation, will close ranks around Putin and the regime. Depending on Ukraine's and the West's next moves (primarily resignation or escalation), a general war is now far easier to justify and to rally for by Putin than it has been the past months ago. Couldn't have gone better for Putin. He's now in a far better position than in March and April.
@JordiVallcarca
- Sólo están haciendo su trabajo.
- Pues podrían aprender del cuerpo de Bomberos, que en muchas ocasiones se han negado a seguir órdenes (como facilitar desahucios) que consideraban poco éticas.
"Al hablar del militarismo, la prensa nos condiciona a pensar en los remotos regímenes dictatoriales donde los líderes se visten con uniformes militares y los tanques vagan por las calles, o en los capítulos 'excepcionales' de la historia contemporánea, como las dictaduras ya superadas de hace unas décadas. Pero, ¿es cierto que el militarismo es la excepción y no la norma en la sociedad democrática? Y bajo el gobierno más progresista de Europa, el de Syriza en Grecia, seguro que el militarismo habría disminuido al menos en parte, en comparación con el anterior gobierno de derechas. ¿O no?
Basado en la experiencia griega, ese texto - escrito por Xupoluto Tagma, el Batallón Descalzo, veteranos del movimiento contra el servicio militar obligatorio desde una perspectiva proletaria y anti-autoritaria - nos demuestra cómo un militarismo autóctono no ha hecho más que crecer en los años de gobierno progresista, así señalando 'la relación genética entre el militarismo y el Estado'". https://khp.ignorelist.com/attachment/ca77d20a4ccbba2cfe206867cb417d038ea00aaecaeee068d876babc9ca1b817/view
>I'm struggling to know how it's possible to really block something like a profiler on things like public fedi profiles.
I use several techniques, and I'm sure there are a lot more. And right, it is quite possible that I'm not blocking all of them, but it is one of my duties to try my best. What you are asking here is that I stop doing one of the duties I have as an admin.
> It's public so it really doesn't matter.
Maybe to you, but it does matter to other users that, even posting publicly, wish to remain as annonymous as posible.
> Its likely that many won't or won't even declare that they are search engines/bots
That is very true. And that's why I also block the ones I found.
> The problem is I don't have a big online presence like you might think, so things like this would help a lot.
I don't know which presence you have online. I'm sorry, but I can't help you on this one. I hope you understand.
I'm struggling to know how it's possible to really block something like a profiler on things like public fedi profiles.
It's public so it really doesn't matter. All the above would do is say that my page is visitable by search engines which abide by rules in the 'robots.txt' file. Its likely that many won't or won't even declare that they are search engines/bots etc.
The problem is I don't have a big online presence like you might think, so things like this would help a lot.