Reading a Fedi thread between someone who immediately discards @alex 's article about how Pleroma is dead and SoupBox in general for being "transphobic", and someone who fails to see anything hateful about his articles.
I actually think that GNU social JP is the more reasonable side of the conversation.
test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test
. @senooken
test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test
@senooken
test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test
. @senooken
test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test
. @senooken
test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test test
I think the collaborative approach is the way to go: a common (as much as possible) database of spam mails. As soon as the first server is affected, the spam mail is stored and the rest of the servers are aware of it, automatically rejecting the creation of an account.
I'm no programmer though, don't know if this would be a lot of work...
@bufalo1973 Well, not in the way I think about it. If it is implemented in an "opt-in" way, servers which adhere to it will gain an anti-spam measure; servers which won't will stay the same as we are now.
@aab I think you are talking about some kind of "social credit". If a server gets a warning about a spam/hate/... user and the server does nothing, the server loses "federation points". If it gets too low, the server becomes a "poisoned server".