Notices by an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info), page 2
-
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 05-May-2022 03:01:17 JST 
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
Flipper Zero finally arrived!Husky_1651685101164_3X0W7R72OU.…Husky_1651685135633_Y7NHTOOIIF.… -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 05-May-2022 03:01:13 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@tk It's a pentesting/hacking multi-tool/toy. It can interact with (read, save and emulate for now) multiple types of wireless communications (RFID, NFC, 1wire, infrared, sub GHz), act as a Rubber Ducky/badusb device to run scripts on computers you plug it in, and in theory also interact with bare electronics in all sorts of way with the GPIO ports. With a cute Tamagotchi-like interface. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Sunday, 01-May-2022 23:55:25 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs There are supposed to be some around here, but I don't think I've ever seen one. Maybe I don't play outside enough -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Friday, 29-Apr-2022 04:40:24 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs @lain And the risk of them doing that is that they might stop inviting everyone on their land to have parties. Which they already do, as they already have clearly discriminatory moderation. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Friday, 29-Apr-2022 04:29:33 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs @lain We're not talking current law but preferable laws; spurious civil suits don't need a blanket immunity to be dismissed, they could be dismissed on other grounds, such as not enough notice being given considering the resources of the defendant, no demonstrated harm, etc. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Friday, 29-Apr-2022 04:22:04 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@lain I agree in the sense that free association is the superior principle here, but with one caveat that I simply do not think the current hypocrisy of "we can't be expected to be responsible for user content, it's impossible without drastic measures!", and then proceeding to heavily curate user content anyway should be tolerated. Within the context of the state and legal system being here and probably being here for the foreseeable future, I expect and demand consistency. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Friday, 29-Apr-2022 04:22:03 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@lain Within the metaphors of free association, if someone goes to your backyard, sets up a catapult and starts lobbing rocks at the neighbors, you can expect to get some grief from the neighbors. If you have a reasonable explanation, such as that you are alone, it's a big backyard and were on vacation and could not have possibly noticed and stop the catapult before it started throwing rocks, then I expect they would understand. But if you have a large staff, security cameras everywhere and in the same time period you've expelled tens of people who weren't setting up catapults in your yard, then I think it's not unreasonable to start thinking maybe you should be held responsible for allowing the catapult guy to setup on your land. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 06:09:28 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs @Moon @ademan @conti @helene >only applies to big corporationsYou don't really have to, you could easily modulate the expectation of moderation in a good faith clauses to the ability of the party in question. The ability of a small blog or small fedi server to moderate content that opens them to liability is not the same as that of a big corporation. While infringing content could be reasonably left for a week on a small blog because the only moderator is on vacation and couldn't be expected to remove it, a large corporation with a staff that's watching 24/7 wouldn't be given the same benefit of the doubt if they ignored for a week something that's been flagged for their moderators to look at (I guess unless they can give a really good reason as to why no one had a chance to take it down).Another possible type of moderation that I could see granting for companies that chose to be conduits for speech rather than curators, is that of off-topic speech, provided the scope of what is on-topic is clearly delineated and that the application of the moderation is not fickle but even-handed. If a site wants to be an echo chamber, they have to own it, say it, and apply it fairly. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 05:49:38 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs @Moon @ademan @conti @helene >even though i'm off at work and can't watch the thing all day constantlyThat used to be the case, but now they do have the tools and the manpower to keep watch essentially 24/7, they keep demonstrating it every day. Good faith clauses could also be given, providing them with reasonable chance to do moderate speech that opens them to liability.I know this this would suck, I don't WANT them to take this route, and I don't think they would, but to avoid the charge that this is forcing companies to act like a government, they have to be given that option.I would much rather they decide to broadly allow content that is legal and not breaking the site on a technical basis and avoid all this. It's really not that hard for them to be; just don't hire activists to do your moderation, fire them when you catch them doing politically motivated moderation. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 05:30:56 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs @Moon @ademan @conti @helene They don't have to be affiliated, but once a website demonstrate the ability and willingness to curate content on other basis than simple technical merits (spam) or strict legal requirements, they are not just acting as simple conduits, they are clearly making editorial decisions. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 04:47:14 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs @Moon @ademan @conti @helene >oh my gosh, not the "publisher / platform" thing again, pleaseYes, that again. It's important.The website can't be held accountable because of exceptions carved specifically on the basis of extending free speech. The spirit of the law as to why those exceptions were carved out is clear. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 04:37:05 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs @ademan @Moon @conti @helene There is a distinction between "forcing them" and "not enabling them"; a company that is allowed by the government to do things others are not allowed to do (in this case, publish content that would expose, for instance, a newspaper to lawsuits) has to be held to a higher standard. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 28-Apr-2022 03:44:15 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@Moon @conti They think they're being clever and that if they get their posts removed or account banned they can say "See how hypocritical these free speech people are!"Except what people are complaining about Twitter hiding, removing or banning for years is, for the most part, not already illegal personally targeted death threats. While many would argue these should be allowed, it's not even close to being the first hill people would propose to die on. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Apr-2022 09:49:18 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
Voted "guy, grils" because there was no "bear, mitsu" option. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Apr-2022 03:58:41 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
I'm in my being very in love with my wife era. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Monday, 21-Mar-2022 13:40:13 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs Everyone should watch sports. It's an endless source of emergent expressions of classical narratives through the medium of competition. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 10-Mar-2022 08:09:41 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs It's like I'm unable to overwrite permanently my memories of KFC being tasty when I was a child. I'm always disappointed, I'm pretty sure the chicken is getting worse and worse there, but for my whole adult life I've still had these cravings for the KFC I remember every 6 to 12 months. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Thursday, 10-Mar-2022 08:02:03 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@shmibs Me whenever I get KFC. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Mar-2022 10:42:44 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@Moon @lain @shmibs me: takes hormones to become true formImpossibleWateryFeline-max-1mb.… -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Mar-2022 10:37:20 JST
an actual bear in a hazmat suit
@lain @Moon @shmibsjuuouki-altered-beast.gif
All senooken JP Social content and data are available under the 
