Conversation
Notices
-
@sjw @rawrrawrfox @sjw @LimticLewd @Neko_Mizu @matrix @mwvdragon
laughing girlfriend X.gif
- せのお (妹尾 賢) likes this.
- せのお (妹尾 賢) repeated this.
-
@Neko_Mizu @nepfag @LimticLewd @sjw @rawrrawrfox they are saying racism and sexism is ok if you are the right group
-
@Neko_Mizu @LimticLewd @nepfag @rawrrawrfox @sjw you want a sign of who has the institutional power. It is who is the one enforcing therefore their prejudice plus power is themselves
-
@LimticLewd @rawrrawrfox that is really the only thing I can think of. Victim points and free shit. If it is about being misgendered and other stuff like that no one owes anyone anything when it is to call by what they want. That is not a right. Respect is not given for free. Some will do it out of kindness while others you will have to earn that.
-
@LimticLewd @xeno @igeljaeger
honestly, i just see it as the utilization of politically correct puritanical puppets in order to make a political takeover more likely. Transgenderism is one part of it, though we've seen how all branches of PC culture are pure cancer. All of them are just tyranny trying to masquerade itself as having some humanitarian pseudo-moralistic purpose.
It is working in the UK and i don't think it would take much to break the will of people at this point...
- sargon is being investigated by police for the jess phillips joke,
- 4000 people per year get arrested for tweets (presumably the communications act)
- a SPOON was confiscated as a weapon along with knives
- a man is in prison for carrying a potato peeler
- a TERF arrested for saying "but men aren't women though"
- a guy who liked a TERF's poem tweet was called up by a police officer who was "concerned for your thinking"
- an old lady pointed out to the police that it is prohibited for people to pray in the park, the police officer at the location agreed after a prolonged argumentation but chose not to do anything, she was later arrested by police officers who pulled her out of her house through the front door
- the same old lady on a different occasion pointed out that someone shouldnt be praying on the street and she was brutally assaulted by one person while another was simultaneously moralizing about how we all should be tolerant (i believe no legal action was taken but i could be wrong)
- only leftist politicians get invited to a political debate where one claimed that "referenda are the tools of dictatorships [therefore we need another referendum]"
- under applicable law, simply having a dislike of a religion (exclusively islam) can be considered a form of hatespeech and therefore prosecutable
and these are just the things i know and can recall of the top of my head
human rights here are fast declining. obviously the laws in question aren't enforced to the fullest extent, but at this point i'd say give it enough time..
-
@igeljaeger @xeno @LimticLewd
> when it is impossible to tell if its a joke or a serious
-
@LimticLewd @xeno @igeljaeger
they want political leverage - to be able to publically shame; excommunicate; accuse prosecute and sentence any person in disagreement with them. they want to define themselves as permanently and absolutely correct. more correct than reality itself, because reality with its biological limits must be incorrect before a trans person. they want trans supremacy
personally, i want to stick to individual rights as outlined in the US constitution + an additional right to privacy and digital privacy. I think im not asking too much
-
@LimticLewd @Kiiro @igeljaeger @xeno SJWs have big scum
-
@machetebadger @LimticLewd @igeljaeger @xeno if the concern of trans activists is that their human rights might be taken away if some government authorities deem them "inhuman", then isnt the best solution to have these governments pass a very simple bill/legislation which makes a 1 sentience claim "trans people are human, and therefore all human rights apply to trans people regardless of the way they live"
but what we've observed instead is canada passing bill that makes it a legal offense for an individual to say the wrong pronoun. people have warned that this will be used for arbitrary prosecutions due to the vagueness of the law and they weren't wrong. the law doesnt specify how many times or with what intensity must the wrong pronouns be claimed. you could just say the wrong pronoun by mistake - that is still equal violation of the law as any other form of misgendering
we have also seen a similar law in new york. the difference there is that it forces businesses, as entities, to not misgender a trans person
and we have not even began to consider the possibility that someone is trans and yet nothing in their appearance suggests so. should individuals be prosecuted and businesses be sued if they happen to not be mind readers to know this in advance?
i don think this sort of thing comes form a compassionate motive, because the punishment for not complying is purely tyrannical for the individual - pay a fine or go to prison and have your life ruined;
or unjust for the business - pay a six figure fine every time you dont get the pronoun right and get bankrupt
we are also seeing some massive corporate movements, for example to push trans people in women's sports when thats not appropriate due to different physical attributes between a male body and a female body - this has nothing to do with trans being deemed inhuman and having their human rights taken away. it has to do with fair competition.
nepfag
mwvdragon ?
Tamamo
All senooken JP Social content and data are available under the 