senooken JP Social
  • FAQ
  • Login
senooken JP Socialはsenookenの専用分散SNSです。
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Oneesan succubus (lain@pleroma.soykaf.com@pleroma.soykaf.com)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 15:19:52 JST Oneesan succubus Oneesan succubus
    • Oneesan succubus
    • Quad ?
    • Stanislas :nixos:
    @quad @angristan raid-z has much better recovery characteristics than raid-5. Also, the tools overall are much nicer. If you dont need raid-5/z, you can use the standard Linux stuff.
    In conversation Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 15:19:52 JST from pleroma.soykaf.com permalink
    • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 18:49:18 JST バツ子(喉痛いよX_X バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      • Quad ?
      • Stanislas :nixos:
      • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      @quad @angristan
      checksum?
      In conversation Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 18:49:18 JST permalink
    • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 18:51:53 JST バツ子(喉痛いよX_X バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      • Quad ?
      • Stanislas :nixos:
      • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      @quad @angristan
      at that point, ought to just run btrfs itself

      except the like raid5 bugz thing

      except then zfs is basically the same thing
      In conversation Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 18:51:53 JST permalink
    • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 18:55:13 JST バツ子(喉痛いよX_X バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      in reply to
      • Quad ?
      • Stanislas :nixos:
      • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      @quad @angristan
      dunno, been on btrfs "raid1" for a long while now, but for a proper nas, in a magical future of having more than $30 at a time, would just do bsd. mdraid was annoying enough on its own without everything
      In conversation Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 18:55:13 JST permalink
    • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 19:00:42 JST バツ子(喉痛いよX_X バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      • Quad ?
      • Stanislas :nixos:
      • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      @quad @angristan
      yeh, suppose so, but like for such different filesystems would be more likely here to just use a different (set of) disk(s)

      could be different trying to run a hosting company or something, but
      In conversation Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 19:00:42 JST permalink
    • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 19:03:28 JST バツ子(喉痛いよX_X バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      • Quad ?
      • Stanislas :nixos:
      • バツ子(喉痛いよX_X
      @quad @angristan
      yeh, i get where you're coming from. to me, though, it seems a bit overly grained, like running a separate os on every core of a multicore system, like it makes sense to me for a filesystem to span multiple disks, and it seems like raid was only made after the fact as a patch-job to handle an un-prepared-for usecase
      In conversation Thursday, 17-Oct-2019 19:03:28 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

senooken JP Social is a social network, courtesy of senooken. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All senooken JP Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.