Conversation

Notices

1. バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:17 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

   in reply to

   • lain
   • Drew DeVault
   • brettgilio
   • Sergiu Marton :guix:
   @lain @sir @brettgilio @brown121407 maybe it's picking nits, and haven't tried properly using before, but the web interface feels a little messy, is here's first impressionwithout contrast or framing, everything blends together a lot, text areas are a bit too wide to read comfortably, nav context is lost on tickets/mailing tabs, etc. mostly things that could be css-ed and not cause problems for text browsers. the html being a bit more structured, using semantic html5 stuff etc, could be nice for accessibility also, if that was something cared aboutdunno, am walnut gallery
   • lain (lain@lain.com)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:18 JST lain

     in reply to

     • Drew DeVault
     • brettgilio
     • Sergiu Marton :guix:
     @sir @brown121407 @brettgilio that's fine really. but to me, not having the workflow that dozens of people are used to is not a feature. maybe for a fresh start things would be different.
   • Drew DeVault (sir@cmpwn.com)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:20 JST Drew DeVault

     in reply to

     • lain
     • brettgilio
     • Sergiu Marton :guix:

     @lain @brown121407 @brettgilio I didn't say anyone was stupid for wanting these features

     sr.ht provides most of what you mentioned here. Perhaps not with the same workflow, but that's a feature, not a bug.

   • lain (lain@lain.com)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:21 JST lain

     in reply to

     • Drew DeVault
     • brettgilio
     • Sergiu Marton :guix:
     @brettgilio @sir @brown121407 guys. we run a proper open source project, with tons of contributors and lots of commits going on. we use gitlab and are very aware of many of the bad parts it has. still, it does give us features like an integrated CI, user class, a review system, github-style pull requests (yes, people are used to these by now). my point was (and is) that even if srht is good software (and afaict it is) you won't get many people to use it by telling everyone who wants some other feature 'you're holding it wrong, and it's because you're stupid'. the 'naysayer' comment above is again this exact attitude.
   • brettgilio@mstdn.social's status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:26 JST brettgilio

     in reply to

     • lain
     • Drew DeVault
     • Sergiu Marton :guix:

     @sir @lain @brown121407 they like to purposefully overgeneralize to make terrible and inconsistent retorts that dont make sense in any context.

   • Drew DeVault (sir@cmpwn.com)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:27 JST Drew DeVault

     in reply to

     • lain
     • Sergiu Marton :guix:

     @brown121407 @lain he probably means pull requests because the lack of them is a thing naysayers often feel is an affront to their sensibilities

   • Sergiu Marton :guix: (brown121407@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:34 JST Sergiu Marton :guix:

     in reply to

     • lain
     • Drew DeVault

     @lain @sir what everyday features does it lack? I found myself missing so few and unimportant things when on Sourcehut that I don't even remember them.

   • lain (lain@lain.com)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:35 JST lain

     in reply to

     • Drew DeVault
     @sir and loses in the following::lazer_x: having features people use and need every daySrht is great software but you'll never convince people to switch by showing its better in some way they don't care much about.
   • Drew DeVault (sir@cmpwn.com)'s status on Saturday, 19-Sep-2020 04:57:36 JST Drew DeVault

     Compared to GitHub and GitLab, SourceHut wins by objective measurements in all of these categories:

     ✓ Free software✓ Reliability✓ Performance