Conversation

Notices

1. nikki (nik@letsalllovela.in)'s status on Monday, 02-Nov-2020 13:50:51 JST nikki

   in reply to

   • nikki
   • kaikatsu
   @kaikatsu it should be up to computers to make computers secure, not fear of legal consequences
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Monday, 02-Nov-2020 13:50:51 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • kaikatsu
     @nik @kaikatsu not really in practice, though, no...at least to me seems, security gets waylaid typically because capitalism. that first-to-market push being prioritised over everything, and management people downplaying the potential cost of breachesdon't think that would change unless there was a massive spike in attacks, but even then places are hit with ransomware etc all the time now and it still makes no real differenceand then what happens with intentional backdoors? and end-users who can't protect themselves with no way of assessing security
   • nikki (nik@letsalllovela.in)'s status on Monday, 02-Nov-2020 13:50:52 JST nikki

     in reply to

     • kaikatsu
     @kaikatsu laws that make hacking illegal encourage entities (public and private) to be lax on security practices because they expect the legal system to be enough of a deterrent alone
   • kaikatsu (kaikatsu@pleroma.site)'s status on Monday, 02-Nov-2020 13:50:53 JST kaikatsu

     in reply to
     @nik In what sense
   • nikki (nik@letsalllovela.in)'s status on Monday, 02-Nov-2020 13:50:54 JST nikki
     hot take there should not be laws protecting computer security