Conversation

Notices

1. Cirno ???? (thestrongest@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 28-Dec-2020 23:50:09 JST Cirno ????

   Download your porn now! “The bill creates sweeping verification guidelines for any site that hosts adult material: any user who uploads material to such a site would have to verify their identity with the site, and every single video posted would have to come with a signed consent form from every individual who appears in the video. All pornography platforms would also be required to disable downloads of videos they host. >Sites would also be required to post instructions for how to have a video removed from the site for any individual who did not consent to appear in a video and wants it taken down. Additionally, platforms would be required to operate a 24-hour hotline for individuals and law enforcement to use for requesting takedowns, and videos flagged to that hotline would have to be removed within two hours of the call. Anyone who indicates to a site owner that they do not consent to appearing in a specific video would also have to be added to a database that effectively makes a “do not upload” list, and any new material would have to be checked against that list before appearing on a platform.”

   https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/12/pornhub-squarely-targeted-in-bipartisan-bill-to-regulate-sex-work-online/

   • Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 28-Dec-2020 23:50:07 JST Infected Moomin

     in reply to

     • Infected Moomin
     @thestrongest > will cause more harm than it fixesthe people these sites harm aren't the sex workers so the harm is detached from them.
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Monday, 28-Dec-2020 23:50:07 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • Infected Moomin
     @Moon @thestrongest > "women and children"evertim> more hoops to dance, 2-hour removal deadline, etcmeans more self-censoring and auto-banning, same as last time> sweeping ban on video downloads for anyone hosting pornographywhat counts as pornography? what do you have to do to count as "not allowing" it? what could go wrong?> require all sex workers to legally tag themselves in every single thing ever uploadeduhm...
   • Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Monday, 28-Dec-2020 23:50:08 JST Infected Moomin

     in reply to
     @thestrongest > databases get leaked, hacked, and breached all the time, and performers would be forced to put a great deal of trust in the platforms that maintain those databases not to leak their most personal of personal information.:shrug_yui: we have standards for sites handling PII, require them to do business
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Monday, 28-Dec-2020 23:58:37 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     • Infected Moomin
     @Moon @thestrongest wording includes 2d also
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Dec-2020 00:04:52 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     • Infected Moomin
     @Moon @thestrongest (2d stills)also discludes sex-workers from any potential protections, as it's an all-or-nothing consent-or-not switch registered with the government, so getting rid of some-guy-drugs-and-rapes-you video requires banning everything you made and switching careers, sothis is kinda horrible, yeh
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Dec-2020 00:15:30 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • Infected Moomin
     @Moon @thestrongest yes, and why does "revenge porn" not include guys?
   • Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Dec-2020 00:15:31 JST Infected Moomin

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @shmibs @thestrongest >evertimI feel this is less "moral objection to pornography, what about the children" than "we want to prevent revenge porn, child sex exploitation" maybe I am naive.
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Dec-2020 00:17:10 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     • Infected Moomin
     @Moon @thestrongest (the bill itself is definitely written from a moral-objection-to-sexual-things-existing standpoint, though, as an aside)