Conversation

Notices

1. knotteye (knotteye@waldn.net)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:14:48 JST knotteye
   I should set up a bookwyrm instance even just to get my wife on fedi. It is pretty cool.Plus I still might end up rolling out that management service.
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:14:45 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • nikki
     @nik @knotteye "anti-capitalist" license encouraging information monopoly for profit <_>
   • nikki (nik@letsalllovela.in)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:14:46 JST nikki

     in reply to
     @knotteye oh interesting
   • nikki (nik@letsalllovela.in)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:14:47 JST nikki

     in reply to
     @knotteye management service?
   • knotteye (knotteye@waldn.net)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:14:47 JST knotteye

     in reply to

     • nikki
     @nik Like masto.host for bookwyrm. Bookwyrm's license doesn't require source availability so you can add proprietary features.
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:17:19 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • nikki
     @nik @knotteye only if you let non-members set the cost of your labour
   • nikki (nik@letsalllovela.in)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:17:20 JST nikki

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @shmibs @knotteye what is this https://github.com/bookwyrm-social/bookwyrm/blob/main/LICENSE.mddoes this mean i couldnt host it on my server that's owned by my friend and i's joint LLC?
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:18:57 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • nikki
     @nik @knotteye meaning unclear, by my decree you will now be paid $400/hour
   • nikki (nik@letsalllovela.in)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:18:58 JST nikki

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @shmibs @knotteye what
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:32:24 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • nikki
     @knotteye @nik well, license's wording won't function in any legal setting regardless, so
   • knotteye (knotteye@waldn.net)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:32:25 JST knotteye

     in reply to

     • nikki
     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @nik @shmibs I think you should be fine since you're both owners and workers. As far as I can tell as long as you have a coop-esque structure instead of having non-working owners that provide capital but not labor you should be fine.
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:46:28 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • nikki
     @knotteye @nik there's no definition anywhere for what "equity" or "vote" etc mean, and other ambiguous language. when the meaning of stuff isn't clear then rulings go in favour of the user against the licenser (i think? not a lawyer ????
   • knotteye (knotteye@waldn.net)'s status on Wednesday, 12-May-2021 00:46:29 JST knotteye

     in reply to

     • nikki
     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @shmibs @nik tbh I dunno why it wouldn't. It might be complex and possibly stupid but stupid legal edge cases exist all the time. It isn't really contradictory its just hard to decipher what a judge would interpret it to mean.