Conversation
Notices
-
バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:01 JST バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; @lain @TheRealClay @kev @moth @guizzy @Moon oil paintings are fancy textured 3d objects that can't be printed yet. would be fair comparison in a super 3d printing future, though, same then for whatever other objects could be printedcircumvent scarcity first before reintroducing it artificially -
lain (lain@lain.com)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:03 JST lain @guizzy @Moon @TheRealClay @kev @moth i think the framing gives you the completely wrong impression. the Mona Lisa itself is an NFT! You can print out a million mona lisas on your laser printer at home, but that makes nobody say 'duh why are the idiots at the louvre putting this on display i can just buy a poster of it on amazon'. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:04 JST an actual bear in a hazmat suit @lain @Moon @TheRealClay @kev @moth I mean, it is accurate in the way it describes it as a label that says "x person owns the Mona Lisa". It's just framed to make it sound as stupid as possible, glossing over the fact that, yeah, so's a deed to land, and few people would argue the value of that. -
lain (lain@lain.com)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:05 JST lain @guizzy @Moon @TheRealClay @kev @moth domain names are NFTs. concert tickets are NFTs. signed and numbered prints are NFTs. The OP image description is firmly in the 'not even wrong' area as well. -
Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:06 JST Infected Moomin @guizzy @moth @TheRealClay @kev the original NFT analogy at the top of the thread is somewhat accurate I hate to admit. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:06 JST an actual bear in a hazmat suit @Moon @TheRealClay @kev @moth Yeah, it's an uncharitable framing of an accurate understanding of it. There's plenty of examples of people willingly giving money to be associated with art they cannot physically have in their possession. And outside of art, there's also the possibility of unlocking something external to the blockchain with proof of NFT ownership. -
an actual bear in a hazmat suit (guizzy@pleroma.guizzyordi.info)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:07 JST an actual bear in a hazmat suit @moth @Moon @TheRealClay @kev Not Even Wrong is a turn of phrase used to refer to a take so utterly out there and misinformed it transcends right and wrong. -
moth (moth@husk.site)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:08 JST moth @Moon @TheRealClay @kev >.>;; I mean, he is, but ok. -
Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:09 JST Infected Moomin @TheRealClay @kev you're not even wrong -
Clay Ferguson (therealclay@fosstodon.org)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:15 JST Clay Ferguson @kev ???? This is an absolutely perfect description of #NFT ???? ????
The analogy also perfectly applies to all #CryptoTokens
#CryptoCoins all claim they represent some "value" that wasn't created out of thin air.
Yet if you quiz a #CryptoCulter on this question, they end up claiming it was the "mining" that created the value,
...but mining has no value unless the Coins already have value, and so it's a "Circular Argument".
The real reason BTC has value is "Because Brainwashing" period, full stop
-
Kev Quirk :kubuntu: (kev@fosstodon.org)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jun-2021 23:58:20 JST Kev Quirk :kubuntu: #NFT explained. In case you were wondering...
-