Conversation
Notices
-
@sevvie it's so frustrating, the right license even exists, he just didn't pick the right one.
-
@Moon @sevvie CC licenses are all by isn't it? so people need to be like "hey, i'm trying to sell this thing you can get for free here"
-
@Moon @sevvie other than 0
-
@Moon @sevvie acknowledged in a way that people doing the "buying" don't actually see it then? or does no one care? confused <_>
-
@shmibs @sevvie the particular license the artist chose requires attribution (and the NFTs abide by it) and allows commercial use, he could have chose the non-commercial version.I don't even have a problem with him disliking NFTs or capitalism, I totally get that. But he could have picked the right license and this all would be a non-issue.
-
@Moon @sevvie that's not what i mean; don't understand why anyone would pay some random person for it, unless they don't realise
-
@shmibs @sevvie The artist himself said they abided by the legal requirements of the license, so at least to him that part is a non-issue. He invoked his "moral rights" to argue they should not have been made (he also said it was too much work to fight it in court though)