Conversation

Notices

1. Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Mar-2022 10:54:04 JST Infected Moomin
   what if we can't predict weather because it already runs as fast as the universe allows
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; likes this.
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Mar-2022 10:54:19 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to
     @Moon but actually exactly this though
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Mar-2022 11:02:25 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to
     @Moon i think it's necessarily so, as the alternative would imply strong emergence (lower-level detail that's not in any way at all represented reflected in higher-level phenomena), and that would mean a lower bound for our analysis and simulations as wellcan be systems that are *nearly* emergent in that way, like running simulations on a modern computer is designed to be, but still don't have closed systems to keep out the random cosmic radiation and things. and anything we could use to analyse the weather would need to be outside-looking-in, implying open system (otherwise it would need to be part of the system and model itself inside itself
   • Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Mar-2022 11:02:26 JST Infected Moomin

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @shmibs am I accidentally smart
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Mar-2022 11:03:52 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @Moon maybe there's some "more base reality" with information cloning or something, though, and a person there could run it; dunno
   • Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Tuesday, 22-Mar-2022 11:03:56 JST Infected Moomin

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     @shmibs yeah...thats what I was thinking too!
     バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; likes this.