senooken JP Social
  • FAQ
  • Login
senooken JP Socialはsenookenの専用分散SNSです。
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Hotpocket Enjoyer (sloppyhog@paypig.org)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:03:16 JST Hotpocket Enjoyer Hotpocket Enjoyer

    Gun ownership, way worse then <checks clipboard> CP?!
    https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2022/6/7/23152759/gun-restrictions-rights-second-amendment-mass-school-shootings-violence-child-porn-pornography

    I guess it's #PrideMonth so they couldn't pop off about childhood obesity or single motherhood. They had to stay on message.

    In conversation Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:03:16 JST from paypig.org permalink

    Attachments


    • バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:03:11 JST バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
      in reply to
      • Infected Moomin
      @Moon @sloppyhog
      hmm,,, things are not so simple as that if looking "actual harm" rather than legal. production of such pictures tends to involve violations of trust, coercion, maybe physical abuse, but anonymised there's argument "it's not hurting anyone now" could be made. and a gun is a risk, deadly implement that's lighter and easier to manipulate and cause damage with than other such, like cars etc, making it greater risk for children etc. but pictures could also have risk of it becomes deanonymised or encountered by the picture subject somehow, which can hurt that person, and there's question of if obsessing over such pictures leads to future abuse risk as well etc. so dunno
      In conversation Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:03:11 JST permalink
    • Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:03:12 JST Infected Moomin Infected Moomin
      in reply to
      @sloppyhog the reason possession of child pornography is illegal is that it violates the rights of the victim. There's no equivalent to that with owning a gun because I bought my gun and its existence doesn't hurt anybody by just existing.
      In conversation Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:03:12 JST permalink
    • バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:08:48 JST バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
      in reply to
      • Infected Moomin
      @Moon @sloppyhog
      mmm, for gun kept in house i think the danger is usually more 自殺 and accidents than intentional but
      In conversation Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:08:48 JST permalink
    • Infected Moomin (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:08:49 JST Infected Moomin Infected Moomin
      in reply to
      • バツ子(痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
      @shmibs @sloppyhog yeah I was only looking at it from an individual harm perspective, it could be argued that existence of a bunch of guns leads to gun violence whether or not your particular gun shot someone.
      In conversation Wednesday, 08-Jun-2022 23:08:49 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

senooken JP Social is a social network, courtesy of senooken. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All senooken JP Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.