Trolli Schmittlauch ????
@matilde @Gargron I'd like to object to that: Rebroadcasting things you disagree with in a framed way is important for discussing/ pointing out things you find wrong with an explanation to your followers.
There are some things I don't discuss with the original posters (e.g. I don't discuss with nazis), but I still want to educate people about their manipulative arguments or lies.
Even more important, criticism and the object of critics are a single unit.
Trolli Schmittlauch ????
@matilde @Gargron It's probably another use case. I just wanted to point out that CommentRT doesn't only have downsides. One can weigh the different consequences of that feature against each other and then decide for being better of without it, though.
Trolli Schmittlauch ????
@matilde @Gargron I guess you can't really prevent that. IMHO that feature was ann attempt to prevent people from posting screenshots of tweets, which is also an antipattern.
How should I deal with the described posts then? I see that the possibility of commenting a post publicly *enables* abuse, but in the end it matters of *how* stuff is commented to make it abuse or not. Furthermore, I'd prefer to "that thing @ foo did is bad" instead of "@ foo is bad (as a whole/ as a person)"
senooken JP Social is a social network, courtesy of senooken. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All senooken JP Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.