Although the "plan" is to replant the same number of trees in the area it will take decades for those trees to serve local residents and fauna and to provide the requisite cooling and tree canopy cover that we so desperately need to retain.
We can value the time and the thought that went into the proposal, but its not good. It's bulky, intrusive and dangerous in terms of its misallocation of resources. We need more space for urban farming and resilience, not wasteful paths.
I'm shocked by the sheer scale of the tree loss and its overall bulk
There are seven (7) regulated or significant trees that are set for the wood-chipper (marked by me in purple) and by my count, over 70 other trees!
We really do not need this development. We can upgrade the amenity and curtilage around the 32 Devon St villa and add /limited/ security video to the Mike Turtur underpass while also widening it slightly. A local heritage place need /not/ be destroyed but may be adapted as a place for security/rail personnel or some other community purpose (if not returned to private hands?).
(I produced this animation from the aerial view in the report, marking trees myself from elsewhere in report and labelled the station and reserve.)
Don't worry about breaking anything, as I keep backups of everything, and I don't test these changes in production.
I'm sorry, I have no idea about mobile experience, as I don't own a smartphone. I do use an Android virtual machine from time to time, so I could test it there if necessary.
Nevertheless, I think that if you could contribute your changes in https://gnusocial.net/url/11347297 it would be easier for anyone willing to use "elbinario" theme with your changes.
I hope you are having a great day. Please tell me if you experience any other difficulties with that patch file, when you get a chance to reattempt.
That hunk 17 issue can really be ignored if you manually remove the whitespace after "font-size: 0;". You /may/ even be able to apply the same patch file on (a copy of) the /live/ CSS display.css file. Because all the customisation we added appears to be after such patches and so the line numbers in the patchfile /should/ line up perfectly.
Do tell me if there are any issues though.
It would give me great pleasure to see GNUSocial with Elbinario Theme develop into a /consistently/ visually pleasing theme, and I feel like step one is getting the desktop and mobile basic experiences up to par. My understanding is that the theme is currently not 'mobile-first' /or/ even mobile-last? I will be able to do 'mobile-first', but I need to gain my own confidence with the CSS that I'm not breaking anything. (Yes I know that the theme is already currently broken in many ways but I don't want to add to it, of course 😁)
But if that is the case and that is the service the email provider primarily offers, then why are both tasks (storage and organisation) so badly solved?
@pontus Although I can translate your notices, I only speak spanish and english; if you wish, tell me the one you prefer.
Anyway, your account is not sandboxed anymore. Enjoy!
@pontus [ESP] Te damos la bienvenida a gnusocial.net. Varias cosas:
- Es NECESARIO responder a este mensaje para levantar el aislamiento inicial de tu cuenta.
- Las cuentas que continúen aisladas al cabo de un mes serán borradas.
- Las cuentas antiguas sin actividad serán borradas al cabo de un año.
- Documentación: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081
[ENG] Welcome to gnusocial.net. Several things:
- You MUST answer to this notice in order to get your account initial sandboxing uplifted.
- Sandboxed accounts will be deleted after one month.
- Old accounts without activity will be deleted after a year.
- Docs: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081