@maltita 😮 Me encantan las focaccias, pero los intentos que he hecho han mutado en... truños, básicamente.
Si te sale bien, ¿podrías pasar la receta? Gracias! :)
@alynn [ESP] Te damos la bienvenida a gnusocial.net. Varias cosas:
- Es NECESARIO responder a este mensaje para levantar el aislamiento inicial de tu cuenta.
- Las cuentas que continúen aisladas al cabo de un mes serán borradas.
- Las cuentas antiguas sin actividad serán borradas al cabo de un año.
- Documentación: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081
[ENG] Welcome to gnusocial.net. Several things:
- You MUST reply to this notice in order to get your account initial sandboxing uplifted.
- Sandboxed accounts will be deleted after one month.
- Old accounts without activity will be deleted after a year.
- Docs: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081
@leomd [ESP] Te damos la bienvenida a gnusocial.net. Varias cosas:
- Es NECESARIO responder a este mensaje para levantar el aislamiento inicial de tu cuenta.
- Las cuentas que continúen aisladas al cabo de un mes serán borradas.
- Las cuentas antiguas sin actividad serán borradas al cabo de un año.
- Documentación: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081
[ENG] Welcome to gnusocial.net. Several things:
- You MUST reply to this notice in order to get your account initial sandboxing uplifted.
- Sandboxed accounts will be deleted after one month.
- Old accounts without activity will be deleted after a year.
- Docs: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081
@fastcore [ESP] Te damos la bienvenida a gnusocial.net. Varias cosas:
- Es NECESARIO responder a este mensaje para levantar el aislamiento inicial de tu cuenta.
- Las cuentas que continúen aisladas al cabo de un mes serán borradas.
- Las cuentas antiguas sin actividad serán borradas al cabo de un año.
- Documentación: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081
[ENG] Welcome to gnusocial.net. Several things:
- You MUST reply to this notice in order to get your account initial sandboxing uplifted.
- Sandboxed accounts will be deleted after one month.
- Old accounts without activity will be deleted after a year.
- Docs: https://gnusocial.net/url/7821081
A Russian defeat won't make it a more civilised nation, not even in the long run. On the contrary, they'd dug in, grow more bitter as the defeat made them poorer, which, on the other hand, would increase it megalomania and sense of historic mission, only to strike again.
True, every major country with a sense of purpose and destiny finally had to give up on these due to a military defeat – Japan, Germany, the UK, Spain, France... all empires turned nations after military defeat ended their sense of destiny. (Which, by the way, is why the U.S. still rolls in its sense of glory and purpose.) A nation that relishes in power and glory needs a defeat from oustside for a chance to leave its sense of mission behind.
But that is not all. China overcame defeat, Russia will too. What distinguishes both from say Germany and Japan after WW II, is that the victorious powers occupied the land and engaged in training people and bureaucratic layers to adopt representative democracy, liberal values ("liberal" not in the sense of "progressive" but as in "egalitarianism"), a market economy more or less balanced with social welfare. Russia doesn't have that nor will it have it in the future. Revanchism is thus the prospect (like Germany after WW I), not the embrace of good citizenry. (And the U.S. doesn't have these things either which is why it is deemed by so many the most dangerous country in the world.)
As gs.net does have OStatus and ActivityPub, I don't understand why mutual subscriptions aren't possible. Esp. as there is no problem for our mutual subscribings with your old account on mastodon.social (excepts for Repeats and Boosts) which dropped OStatus-support altogether. Perhaps the maintainer of your instance's softare can figure things out. Hope you keep posting another while form your old m.s.-account.
Where I can I prefer dead tree editions. This one is the "Handwörterbuch des Deutschen Aberglaubens" (1927-1942). There are a lot of low-priced reprints in paperback but I managed to get the hardcover 1st edition in a nearly pristine condition. It was published by Walter de Gruyter in Berlin, and the time of publishing may raise serious reluctance, but the editors and the editorial staff have been Swiss academics. Wonderful articles, with an overwhelming width of sources. Obviously outdated today, but modern dictionaries on that topic, although with different editorial guidelines, are not better, often don't even match it. Just another confirmation for my predilection for outdated and neglected dictionaires and encyclop(a)edias. :-) https://gnusocial.net/attachment/1338d465f5a01df0ebf8fb21b745c769851cdcb47272d384ccb655a1933cd076/view
No, there are people from other instances posting to this group. Also I am a member of ! fnetworks, which resides on nu.federati.net: https://nu.federati.net/group/239/id I don't know what prevents your joining the group, perhaps @administrator can explain.
I don't know. @administrator didn't cut back on functionality for that reason, as far as I know. My guess is that it's a glitch in the software, perhaps the upcoming v3 of gnusocial brings some improvements.