Notices by In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club), page 52
-
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:32:38 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@hehe someone broke them at some point in the past -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:31:43 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@augustus imagine unironically having hope in a top-down reorganization of a liberal society -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:30:39 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
Obrazovanshchina (Russian: образованщина, "educationdom", "educaties",[1] "smatterers") is a Russian ironical, derogatory term for a category of people with superficial education without higher ethics of an educated person.[2] The term was introduced by Alexander Solzhenitsyn as a criticism of the transformation of the Russian intelligentsia, which, in his opinion had lost high ethical values, in his 1974 essay Obrazovanshchina (translated as The Smatterers).[3] The essay and the term caused criticism from liberal intelligentsia, such as Solzhenitsyn's long-time opponent Grigory Pomerants[4] and Boris Shragin [ru],[5] and was among the reasons of the bitter contention between Solzhenitsyn and the Russian "third wave" of emigration (of dissidents).[6]
In Poland, a country which shares the concept of "intelligentsia" with Russia, a similar term, wykształciuchy is used.[7][8]
Solzhenitsyn defines obrazovanshchina as the category of people who refer to themselves as "intelligentsia" solely on the basis of having a higher than middle education. Solzhenitsyn explains the selection of the term by reference to Vladimir Dahl's dictionary, which distinguished the terms образовать (to educate) and просвещать (to enlighten), the former concept having a superficial character, "external gloss".[3]
A similar criticism of Russian intelligentsia came from Nikolai Berdyaev, who coined the ironic word intelligentshchina for the part of intelligentia locked in their own world, isolated from the rest of the Russian society.[9] -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:28:19 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
day of the egg soon
9ff71e0ca8501940bb09dfaa916a2c0… -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:25:56 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@augustus going all in on science (real science, not silicon valley venture capital marketing bullshit) is kind of britain's only hope to not be an irrelevant island. cummings seems like a weeaboo when he talks about.
i dunno if it's possible to pull off though. i dont think reforming the education system is possible without shooting some eggheads tbh. -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:15:35 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@augustus u can literally taste the seething -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:15:09 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@augustus
>The only fact worth clinging on to is that Johnson and Cummings are the architects of the single most damaging attack on British science that there has ever been and will in all likelihood ever be.
>Another huge win, for Cummings and his universe-dwarfing intellect. Cummings who likes to imagine himself somehow superior to his Bullingdon enabler, merely because he smashes things up through the force of his towering ideas. He, in his imagination and absolutely nowhere else, is Prospero reaping the tempest, dancing on the branches of history. He, you have to believe, is not just another dismal clown, throwing a jug of claret at a wall, trashing some little person’s life in the service of his own ego.
EGGHEADS BTFO -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:10:24 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@augustus baste and AI-pilled -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 16:07:49 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
dominic cooming -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 15:43:17 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@jeffcliff @orekix
>should the state be intelligence testing adults outside of the context of education, welfare/disability or military:
no.
>should private entities be allowed to discriminate based on the results:
absolutely necessary. failure to do this results in runaway credentialism and wealth as proxy for G, which is an even worse outcome. -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 15:37:49 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@jeffcliff @orekix
> but it will never end as long as people cry about unfairness and racism.
(in the context of screening and education) -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 15:36:43 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@jeffcliff @orekix https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=iq+job+performance&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
IQ is an imperfect measure of G which is strongly correlated with all kinds of other important metrics. G is the peak of what a person can be expected to do cognitively. not everyone reaches it, but having too low of a ceiling will fuck your life in a variety of ways. with low G you might manage to work a factory job, but you're going to need help filing your taxes, making long term financial decisions or avoiding scams.
i think the threshold for what can be considered retardation should be increased. there are millions of people who are barely able to hold down a job but desperately need help with anything more complicated. a lot fall into criminality and other anti-social behaviors. this should be preventable, but it will never end as long as people cry about unfairness and racism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_illiteracy -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 15:25:44 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@jeffcliff @orekix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_100,000 -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 15:17:52 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@orekix @jeffcliff
yes. IQ is a great metric to judge who is too retarded to move boxes of ammo around without supervision. -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 15:01:18 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@jeffcliff jesus christ how horrifying. at least i can control my appearance to some extent. -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 14:50:16 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@jeffcliff
>if you judge people based on their IQ i also think you're doing something wrong.
we already do this to prevent retarded people from being drafted into the military or put into normal classrooms. we also screen for high IQs to pick out children with high potential to join the top percentage of people who do the most valuable work.
> Human beings have history, they have emotions and are intelligent. Intelligence changes the dynamic substantially from snowflakes
and human systems do not care about any of that because it is fundamentally impossible to understand the true character of millions of people. judging people by their appearance means you have a working heuristic for evaluating who is worth engaging. the liberal west has the luxury of not having to do this all the time, but as resources and time decrease, you will end up making more and more hard decisions based off of immutable attributes and appearances. people who hold this convenient lie that men contribute to society equally will be completely unprepared when they have to choose who should live and who should starve. -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 14:33:20 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
73211680_10156771698762399_5281… -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 14:20:10 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@jeffcliff there are all kinds of useful numbers that are derived from who you are as a person. your bail money, credit score, risk factor, estimated lifespan, and IQ. you cannot stop organizations from making decisions based off data, and it's not necessarily a bad thing as long as the formula used to calculate these numbers are the same for everyone.
people are not as unique as they want to think, and can be reduced down to their demographics without losing much resolution. snowflakes are all unique but the weight of snow is still a constant. -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 13:16:07 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
@augustus sir this one's defective. it wont stop drooling and there's too many chromosomes... -
In Naraka (permanently) (mono@shitposter.club@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 14-Dec-2019 13:02:31 JST
In Naraka (permanently)
EFyhcxkXUAANK41.png