Notices by Banned for siding with pleroma developers (ilja@ilja.space)
-
Banned for siding with pleroma developers (ilja@ilja.space)'s status on Monday, 05-Sep-2022 04:37:50 JST Banned for siding with pleroma developers What if we all decided to learn Spanish? -
Banned for siding with pleroma developers (ilja@ilja.space)'s status on Sunday, 03-Apr-2022 22:23:04 JST Banned for siding with pleroma developers @helene Even better, it has pattern matching :) Destructuring is only one property that comes from that -
Banned for siding with pleroma developers (ilja@ilja.space)'s status on Sunday, 03-Apr-2022 22:23:02 JST Banned for siding with pleroma developers @helene In case you're interested, I wrote an article on it https://blog.ilja.space/~/B/Pattern%20matching%20in%20Elixir%20and%20why%20it's%20so%20great -
Banned for siding with pleroma developers (ilja@ilja.space)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Nov-2020 06:31:28 JST Banned for siding with pleroma developers @lain @shmibs Even ubi / negative income tax (which I consider a specific implementation of ubi) isn't per sé "left". Here (Belgium) we had a political party called Vivant once who's economically right wing and wanted to implement ubi.One reason I don't consider ubi inherently "left" is exactly the fact that ubi *is* a flat system. You still need an extra social net in order to protect people who fall victim to decease for example. You can (and, imo, should) add such systems, but they aren't inherently part of ubi. And, iirc, these social nets were exactly were vivant wanted to divert the money from to pay the ubi.Another thing is that ubi may help people, but, and this was the reasoning Vivant had, it can also help businesses securing more profit. If you have a ubi, then businesses may need to pay less wages and minimum wage could even be eliminated. This is a very right wing view on ubi imo. -
Banned for siding with pleroma developers (ilja@ilja.space)'s status on Monday, 27-Jul-2020 04:27:55 JST Banned for siding with pleroma developers @Mitsu @Moon Yes