Conversation

Notices

1. Fedilab (tom79@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 31-May-2019 05:12:40 JST Fedilab

   Do you think it's the role of app developers to block instances? #poll

   [ ] Yes
   [ ] No
   [ ] Without opinion

   • チャノロジー、30日@南フ42a and ? Himawari Prodromou repeated this.
   • Igeljaeger (igeljaeger@the.hedgehoghunter.club)'s status on Friday, 31-May-2019 09:00:30 JST Igeljaeger

     • Igeljaeger
     • Work to Die, School is Fuck
     • opal
     @lesbianhacker @tom79 @wowaname why do you commies hate lolis so much
     sample_8ba386d2588649a9ff3b0de9…
     nepfag repeated this.
   • チャノロジー、30日@南フ42a (japananon@pawoo.net)'s status on Friday, 31-May-2019 20:05:43 JST チャノロジー、30日@南フ42a

     in reply to

     @tom79 No. An app developer hard-coding an instance block is employing ideological authoritarianism in using their personal biases to impose a decision on all users without their consent.

     If a given instance is so unpopular that nobody wants to see it, users can (and likely will) make the individual decision to block. At scale, this solution yields the same results without unilateral, centralized decision-making by devs.

   • AndStatus@Mastodon (andstatus@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Jun-2019 03:28:48 JST AndStatus@Mastodon

     • Subway Tooter
     • :abunhdhappyhop: :abunhdhappy: :abunhdhop: :abunhd:
     • Marius Orcsik

     @mariusor Yes, I'm dreaming about real #ActivityPub service including Client to Server protocol.
     And this already comes true step by step, see https://github.com/andstatus/andstatus/issues/499 and my posts via ActivityPub C2S https://pleroma.site/users/AndStatus
     The real power for a User comes with several accounts at different servers.
     @SubwayTooter @tom79@mastodon.social @kaniini @AndStatus

     AndStatus repeated this.