Conversation

Notices

1. pernia (pernia@freecumextremist.com)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Oct-2021 23:20:30 JST pernia

   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
   • 「VRISKA」
   @vriska @shmibs it is the description of nature
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Oct-2021 23:20:26 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • 「VRISKA」
     • Greyperson
     • m
     @dhfir @pernia @vriska @meeper > "the experiments are inside my head so they don't count as real experiments"> dude gedanks his way to special relativity without you
   • Greyperson (dhfir@expired.mentality.rip)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Oct-2021 23:20:28 JST Greyperson

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     • 「VRISKA」
     • m
     @meeper @pernia @vriska @shmibs math is logic without induction.Logic without induction is not science.
   • m (meeper@outerheaven.club)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Oct-2021 23:20:30 JST m

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     • 「VRISKA」
     @pernia @vriska @shmibs humans made math; humans are natural -> math is natural hence math is a science.
   • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;; (shmibs@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Oct-2021 23:26:39 JST バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;

     in reply to

     • 「VRISKA」
     • Greyperson
     • m
     @dhfir @pernia @vriska @meeper every time a person does new-theorem it's 1. based on such preexisting knowledge and 2. hopefully confirmed by experiments run on other brains etc> "does this new bit of maths work?"> 800 yehs and one no> okkie, good enough
   • Greyperson (dhfir@expired.mentality.rip)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Oct-2021 23:26:41 JST Greyperson

     in reply to

     • バツ子（痛いの痛いの飛んでけ;;
     • 「VRISKA」
     • m
     @shmibs @pernia @vriska @meeper 1. Those were based on a preexisting scientific knowledge rooted in axioms based on induction2. The theory of relativity was later confirmed by non-gedanken-experiments.