Notices by チャノロジー、30日@南フ42a (japananon@pawoo.net), page 25

Asking here this way is an extreme long shot, but I figured I might as well try...

If anybody knows anybody who knows anybody who knows anybody etc... who was involved in AntiSec back in 2011-2012, I have a producer of a Japanese webseries who's looking for people to participate in some kind of livestream web show or something. I only half understand it myself.

Odds are I'm going back to him empty handed, but may as well make one last shot in the dark.

@hfaust
But aside from all that, its a fresh followup to the Halloween series!

@hfaust
it'll also be the first ever Halloween 2 to star Jamie Lee Curtis, except Halloween 2 (1981).

@hfaust
Halloween 2 is the sequel to Halloween 2.
But NOT the sequel to Halloween 2.

I'd like to stress, I'm not involved in any development decisions with regard to any Tusky forks.

...but if I /were/ I'd totally go with the branding "Toothy" and use the following icon (released under a CC0 licence, using a modification of "Fang_2_(PSF).png" by Pearson Scott Foresman, released to the public domain on Nov.9 2010)

PeerTube version is now available:

The "No One Cares" Show, Ep 29.5: A Followup on the Frustrating Fediverse Fiasco
https://peertube.anon-kenkai.com/videos/watch/33834b64-f0fe-4f87-9864-79ab10147853

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aSS1nbMUIVXt/

The "No One Cares" Show, Ep 29.5: A Followup on the Frustrating Fediverse Fiasco

In which we follow up on Fedilab, which has chosen to be reasonable, and Tusky, which has chosen otherwise, and answer a few questions regarding the nuances of the situation.

https://github.com/zhiyuan-lin/TuskyUncensored

Oh, wonderful...there's already a de-censored Tusky fork.
Excellent.

@hyphen
I' m more concerned with scaling the idea up for the sake of those who can't or don't know how to fork, modify, and build code. But yes, it isn't de facto difficult to do.
@nepfag @louisoft01 @Tusky @jeff @p @tuxcrafting

@josemanuel
I wouldn't want any extra clauses written into any licences, as the law of unintened consequences would probably come around to fuck me in the ass, but arbitrary interference with usability like what Tusky's doing strikes me as in bad faith, at the very least.

But anyway, whatever. Just fork around it and get on with our lives I suppose.
@wakarimasen

@josemanuel
That is a good point, though I imagine it could get a little fuzzy trying to define the boundary of "reasonable ability". While I wouldn't agree with the idea, I'm sure some would argue it isn't the developer's responsibility to cater to users with low technical ability.

@why
I meant "pointless" in the sense that it's pointless to enumerate a specific license clause if the ability to fork around bad-faith restrictions in the software already exists. It would be superfluous.

But as somebody else pointed out, assuming the technical ability to fork, modify, and maintain the new version would deprive some users of their rights by some definitions.
@shit