Notices by thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)
-
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 16-May-2022 00:26:47 JST thatguyoverthere ن @shmibs @Hyolobrika @Moon yeah there is a trust issue, but it doesn't require you to outright reject the information without review.You could also argue that a highly centralized system is going to be optimized for specific information transfer to occur, but there could be information filtered out at certain levels which skews our ability to make accurate assessments. -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 16-May-2022 00:01:09 JST thatguyoverthere ن @Moon @Hyolobrika @mjdxp @shmibs I have been thinking about this a lot as it seems nearly every time someone sets out to "fix" a problem they create 3 new ones. I am not sure people are great at calculating ancillary costs when developing a strategy. The bigger the solution the larger the potential problems that will emerge once executed. Less centralized problem solving might result in more errors, but the scale of those errors may be such that they are far less impactful. -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 18-Apr-2022 02:06:04 JST thatguyoverthere ن @shmibs @Moon @lelouchebag @sj_zero @yes yeah am not one who thinks trump was a perfect president or anything. Before he was in office I thought he was just one of them. I just feel fairly confident that he essentially exposed and broke a system of giving the people a false sense of choice. 2020 was a course correction but I think they exposed even more of their hand. -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 18-Apr-2022 01:51:39 JST thatguyoverthere ن The only real threat posed by WikiLeaks is that it challenges the impunity of the powerful. In order to prevent this idea from spreading through the establishment of a second, third, or hundredth WikiLeaks, potential emulators must be intimidated worldwide. This is why the methodology of WikiLeaks is persecuted and punished in the person of Assange. The spotlight no longer illuminates the official misconduct revealed by WikiLeaks but is pointed exclusively at the messenger. He is declared a rapist, a hacker, a spy, and a narcissist who is trying to evade justice and is not entitled to the protections of press freedom.
-
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 18-Apr-2022 01:51:39 JST thatguyoverthere ن Had the crimes revealed by WikiLeaks been prosecuted and redressed in good faith, it might then have been possible and appropriate to initiate a balanced discussion about the accountability of whistleblowers and journalists. But when murderers, torturers and their superiors go unpunished, whereas non-violent truth-tellers like Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange and Edward Snowden are prosecuted and threatened with sanctions normally reserved for perpetrators of the most serious crimes, then any presumption of good faith on the part of the authorities as been effectively disproved.
-
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 18-Apr-2022 01:51:36 JST thatguyoverthere ن @Moon I think though that if you genuinely believe the USA is basically good, you would want to have any rot exposed to keep it that way. We could be basically good but with subversive tendencies that need to be kept in check. -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 18-Apr-2022 01:51:25 JST thatguyoverthere ن @yes @Moon @sj_zero do you think he really got 80+ million votes though? I still have only met a handful of real people that support him. I'm sure they aren't alone, but I don't know how to swallow that many votes considering he basically campaigned from his basement with the exception of a few apparently very low attendance events. -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 18-Apr-2022 01:51:23 JST thatguyoverthere ن @yes @Moon @sj_zero it's possible for sure. I was already doubtful of the integrity of our elections before all of that (as was congress, the media, and the people), but somehow it became the most trustworthy election of all time ???? -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 18-Apr-2022 01:51:16 JST thatguyoverthere ن @lelouchebag @Moon @sj_zero @yes yeah that's the thing. It's a long running pattern which I think trump managed to break through the first time simply because they weren't prepared to cheat enough. I think the two primary candidates have historically been two sides of one coin -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Mar-2022 08:33:51 JST thatguyoverthere ن @cjd @taylan yeah the process is supposed to correct for bias with peer review. Unfortunately you can make your money before your peers can review your stuff, and if your research aligns with the zeitgeist it's likely disagreeable peers will be ganged up on and cast as kooks. -
thatguyoverthere ن (thatguyoverthere@charlestown.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Mar-2022 08:33:46 JST thatguyoverthere ن @loonycyborg @lain @cjd @taylan this is more what I mean when I say peer review. Actually sitting down and running am experiment to reproduce the results. The old scientific method. Not the modern idea of making sure they don't have any obviously bad math or typos and signing it as sound science.Yes the publish or perish model is junk and results in junk science